Our Little Rant by Eightball & Thundercloud
From InfoAve Premium Issue #94 - August 5, 2005
When Adolf Hitler rose to power in the
1930's, one of the ways he controlled the masses was to institute a policy of censorship
which masqueraded -- for a time -- as protection. His giant, well-oiled propaganda machine
paved the way for censorship, most often portraying it as necessary for the security of
the country or the safety of the individual. By allowing the German people to hear, see
and read only what the government wanted them to hear, see, and read, they assured
their control was absolute. They created an atmosphere in which censorship was not only
acceptable but sometimes even desirable. Did the German people think they were being
treated unfairly by this regime of censorship? No, not really. At least not at first. They
believed it was for their own good. For their own safety. A "benefit" of sorts.
While the above paragraph is an extreme
over-simplification of a very complex issue, the point we want to make
is that no group of people is going to
buy into censorship if it is presented as censorship. And we are, by no means comparing AOL with Hitler. But censorship in any form must never be allowed. Whether it's
a government or an ISP -- it doesn't matter.
In order to sell the masses on the benefits of censorship it
must be marketed delicately - via propaganda or "marketing" (see AOL's TV
commercials). Their Madison Avenue propaganda machine spews forth
moronic commercials which attempt to pound the their audience with the
prevarication that they are totally unsafe unless their under big
brother AOL's omnipotent umbrella. AOL armed with such callow television
spots pays huge sums to pound its same theme over and over and over.
Apparently they assume their audience is about as smart as a lagoon
carp. Their unimaginative and ludicrous commercial with the bug-eyed,
moronic lady with the cake clearly demonstrates this. Can you identify
with her? I would hope not.
Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf --
"The chief function of propaganda is to convince the
masses, who slowness of understanding needs to be given time in order that they may absorb
information; and only constant repetition will finally succeed in imprinting an idea on
their mind.........the slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from several
angles, but in the end one must always return to the assertion of the same formula. The
one will be rewarded by the surprising and almost incredible results that such a personal
In AOL's case, its
propaganda machine describes its ubiquitous, multi-tentacled approach to
"security" and censorship (spam filtering) as a benefit to its users. They're
going to protect you from yourself because they know for a fact that you are not capable
of protecting yourself -- as if you're some kind of mindless, slow-witted oaf that
needs to be constantly led around the Internet by the hand or worse -- on a set of wobbly
training wheels. And, it appears that the protection provided, at least in part, consists
of spam filtering (censorship) -- the underpinnings of which are a set of crazy,
mysterious and arbitrary rules. Cake anyone?
If you think we're exaggerating we're going to tell you
details of a true story and it just happened last week. And we were the target of AOL's
censorship. It's not funny and it should alarm all of you - AOL subscriber or not. Because
the trend is frightening and it's going to get a lot worse if you stand idly by and let it
happen. And you will have no one else to blame but yourselves.
Here's what happened in a
nutshell: on Friday, July 29, 2005 we sent both our InfoAve Premium Edition and InfoAve
Free Edition in the morning as we normally do. By mid-afternoon on that day, it became
very apparent that a great many subscribers had not received their newsletters. After
discussions with our mail list hosting service we began to see a troubling picture being
painted. None of our 20,000+ AOL subscribers received their newsletters. Other ISPs were
not receiving the email either due to a problem with our mail server or with their ISP
AOL cannot deny their policy of arbitrary digital censorship. Upon further
investigation we traced it back to one single link in Issue #183 (Free Edition) and Issue
#93 (Premium Edition). What was this dastardly link that AOL decided that was too
dangerous for you to see? What were they trying to protect you from? Alien beings? Bird
Flu? West Nile Virus? Nope. It was a link to a site we were trying to warn you about.
Well, it's easier to show you than to tell you - so here is the article with the link that
AOL used as the basis for its censorship:
Dave Wants To Know About
"Internet Opinion Group"
What do you know about Internet Opinion Group? They offer free
software in exchange for information about ones self, etc. Wondered if they were a spyware
We think the old adage "there's no such thing as a free lunch" applies. This
company offers "free" software in exchange for information about yourself all
right. PERSONAL information. Very personal. Like your home address, your phone number,
your credit card information, and more. Who are these people? Why would you trust them in
the first place?
This is really scary! It is
basically a way to get as much personal info as they possibly can and make you apply (and
be accepted for) credit cards. I don't know about you, but it would not be worth a piece
of software to give up so much personal info and AGREE they can share with anyone they
want regardless of what software they want to "give" me free. I am sure the
price in the end would be much higher than I'd want to pay!
"...What does "complete" exactly mean?
By "completing" an offer, you are fulfilling the requirements outlined on the
pop-up window that comes up when you click on an offer. For credit card offers, you must
be approved for and activate that credit card to "complete" the offer.*
When our sponsors report to us that you completed their offers, your Account will be
updated accordingly. This will generally take 6 to 8 weeks.
Use of Personal Information
InternetOpinionGroup.com may always use and share with others your personal information:
InternetOpinionGroup.com may also use personal information for any marketing and survey
purpose on behalf of itself and its affiliates and subsidiaries. InternetOpinionGroup.com
may disclose personal information to third party agents and independent contractors that
help us conduct our marketing and survey efforts. Further, InternetOpinionGroup.com may
disclose personal information to other companies in connection with marketing efforts
including but not limited to direct marketing, which may have no relationship to
InternetOpinionGroup.com. Finally, if InternetOpinionGroup.com or any of its assets are
acquired by or merged with another entity, member information will be one of the
transferred assets. ..."
NEXT and probably the worse of
all (since other countries have different laws regarding privacy and personal info):
"...Location of Data and Security
Your information may be stored and processed in the United States or any other country in
which InternetOpinionGroup.com or its affiliates, subsidiaries or agents maintain
facilities, and by using this Site, you consent to any such transfer of information
outside of your country. ..."
I think you should RUN away from this site as fast as you can. Hopefully you have not
given up any personal information to these people. It appears anyone who signs up for this
receives "free software" in exchange for personal information and promises to
sign-up for "credit cards". We can imagine the quantities of email that one
might have to endure by surrendering personal information to this company and ALLOWING
them to share it with anyone they like.
If you look at
that article you'll see that we used the link to Internet Opinion Group (Red Link) as Dave
included it in his question. We were not, obviously promoting that site at all, in fact,
we were warning all our readers about it. AOL censored over 20,000 of our newsletters
because of this one link and prevented or tried to prevent you from learning about
something that could seriously endanger your privacy. AOL's censorship, disguised as
protection, prevented paying subscribers (Premium) from receiving something they paid for
and free subscribers from getting something they asked for.
We can learn from history that censorship almost always
begins as a benign attempt to "protect" citizens from something. At least that
is how it is presented. AOL's protectionism is nothing more than cloaked censorship and it
is getting worse all the time. You don't believe that AOL is big on protectionism? Just
take a look at their puerile television advertising. These advertisements are obviously
geared to those with a fifth-grade education. Their condescending approach to customers
and potential customers is obvious. Their commercials are ridiculous. If AOL wanted to
better serve their customers they would improve their infrastructure, hire more
forward-looking management, and provide better, faster Internet service to customers --
rather than piling on more and more censorship disguised as protection and providing them
with arguably the worst support in the industry.
This censorship by AOL ended up costing us quite a bit of money as we had to re-send
supplemental newsletters to 20,000+ AOL users on Friday and Saturday. Money we should not
have had to spend; money we could ill-afford to spend -- but were forced to spend because
of AOL's censorship policy
We have an obligation to our subscribers and therefore made
the decision to re-send a supplemental newsletter. We wanted to do all we could to make
sure that those who paid for InfoAve Premium received it and those who signed-up for and
presumably wanted their copy of InfoAve Free Edition got it as well. We could ill-afford
to spend the extra money but we are committed to providing our subscribers with that they
paid and/or what they asked for.
To be fair to those fortunate enough not to
subscribe to AOL, we did have some mail server problems on Friday, July
29, 2005. That
combined with ISPs (other than AOL) adding more censorship (spam
filters) wreaked havoc with that day's newsletters. We wanted to point
out that AOL isn't the only ISP that censors its customers email under the
guise of protection.
But, unlike other ISPs whose faulty spam
filters (censorship) prevented some subscribers from receiving the
newsletter - AOL's ridiculous and arbitrary censorship of our newsletter
was based on a single URL (link) inside the newsletter. AOL determined
that that link (URL) was not fit for its subscribers. Was it
pornography? No. Did it incite racial hate? No. It was a link we used in
an article warning our readers about that site. It was your right to
know. It was your right to receive that newsletter and to read the
article about the site that we deem a severe security risk. AOL had
other ideas and prevented its subscribers from getting the entire
newsletter. Censorship at its finest - right here in America.
One of these days, an ISP is going to censor an email
addressed to someone very wealthy and very important and that someone is going to file a
huge class-action lawsuit (AOL is lucky we're not the litigious type)
and the game of censorship under the guise of "spam filtering" will come
to a screeching, welcome end.
In my opinion, AOL should be more concerned
with its lagging technology and poor public image than it is with
obfuscating the truth that AOL continues
to rank near the bottom of Internet Service Providers. They should spend money
upgrading their technology, giving customers better service, and giving customers
value rather than dumping millions into running ridiculous television commercials, and
censoring its customers private email - disguising it as "protection". Indeed
AOL demonstrates again and again its complete disregard for its customers by charging fees
the national average, while providing Internet service well below the national average.
Indeed AOL is the (according
to this survey) the lowest-ranked ISP with a terrible public image
that its current advertising campaign only serves to exacerbate.
Over 20,000 AOL customers didn't get our newsletter last
Friday because AOL censored it. And why did they censor it? Because of a link to a site we
wanted you to be aware of and wanted you to avoid. Censorship disguised as protection is
still censorship and the only good censorship is none at all. Your email is your email. It
does NOT belong to your ISP. You may have to deal with spam on your own terms but at least
you'll be getting all your mail not just the mail that your ISP decides you can have.
You are all adults. You don't need another big brother. You
should be telling your ISP -- in no uncertain terms -- that if they continue to censor
your email in any way you are going to switch to an ISP who respects your right to make
your own decisions and who respects your intelligence. That you're switching to an ISP who
recognizes that email addressed to you is your property and that filtering unwanted email
is your responsibility and not the ISP's.
Censorship in any form is not a service or a benefit even though it may be cleverly
marketed as such. History is replete with governments who successfully
"marketed" censorship to the masses as a benefit or a service necessary for the
security and safety of the individual or society. One thing you can be sure of: where
censorship is allowed to grow, freedom will wither.
Are you ready to take the responsibility for your own email
and tell your ISP you don't want them censoring your email? Or are you going to let this
new digital censorship grow out of control? It's your call. Only you can change it.
Tell us what you think -
Read comments from our
Make a small donation via PayPal, Amazon, or regular mail - even a
couple of dollars helps!
Download a free trial and check your computer. You can't lose- you can
Smileycons | Email
Guardian | Visit Our Security Page | Visit Our Home Page | Subscribe to InfoAve Premium
herein are the opinions of the authors as individuals and do not necessarily
reflect the official opinion of Cloudeight Internet LLC, its hosts, or sponsors. These
Rants are editorials and are, therefore, opinions. All content is copyright ©2005 by Cloudeight Internet LLC (all
Advertisements appearing directly above are provided by Google, Inc. The products
advertised are not endorsed by or tested by us. Please use good judgment when reviewing
software or services advertised above. We make no warranties about any third-party
advertisements appearing above. Thanks!